QR code for Harold Garfinkel ja etnometodologia. Title, Harold Garfinkel ja etnometodologia. Author, John Heritage. Publisher, Gaudeamus, Harold Garfinkel ja etnometodologia. John Heritage ; [suomentajat: Ilkka Arminen et al.] Gaudeamus, c Other Title. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Harold Garfinkel, etnometodologia e o esporte coletivo. Public. · Hosted by Blog do Sociofilo. Interested. clock. Thursday, October 13, at PM –
|Published (Last):||6 May 2011|
|PDF File Size:||1.94 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.4 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Since ethnomethodology has become anathema to certain sociologists, and since those garfinkkel it like to perceive their own efforts as constituting a radical break from prior sociologies, there has been little attempt to link ethnomethodology to these prior sociologies.
Harold Garfinkel S 1967
In as much as the study of social orders is “inexorably intertwined” with the constitutive features of talk about those social orders, ethnomethodology is committed to an interest in both conversational talk, and the role this talk plays in the constitution of that order. Kurt WolfTransaction Publishers, With regard to theory, Garfinkel has consistently advocated an attitude of ethnomethodological indifference, a principled agnosticism with regard to social theory which insists that the shared understandings of members of a social setting under study take precedence over any concepts which a social theorist might bring to the analysis from outside that setting.
John Heritage writes, “In its open-ended reference to [the study of] any kind of sense-making procedure, the term represents a signpost to a domain of uncharted dimensions rather than a staking out of a clearly delineated territory. The job of the Ethnomethodologist is to describe the methodic character of these activities, not account for them in a way that transcends that which is made available in and through the actual accounting practices of the individual’s party to those settings.
Ethnomethodology has perplexed commentators, due to its radical approach to questions of theory and method. On the other hand, the authors and theoretical references cited by Garfinkel do not constitute a rigorous theoretical basis for ethnomethodology. Talk is seen as indexical and embedded in a specific social order. When such analytical concepts are generated from within one setting and conceptually applied generalised to another, the re application represents a violation of the strong form of the unique adequacy requirement of methods.
Sharrock, Bob Anderson, R. The approach was originally developed by Harold Garfinkelwho attributed its origin to his work investigating the conduct of jury members in Views Read Edit View history.
A reader’s guide to ethnomethodology”.
This critique originated in his reading of Alfred Schutzthough Garfinkel ultimately revised many of Schutz’s ideas.
Using an appropriate Southern California example: This section possibly contains synthesis of material which does not verifiably mention or relate to the main topic. According to George Psathasfive types of ethnomethodological study can be etnometodologis Psathas The confusion between the two disciplines stems, in part, from the practices of some ethnomethodologists including Garfinkelwho sift through phenomenological texts, recovering phenomenological concepts and findings relevant to their interests, and then transpose these concepts and findings to etnmoetodologia in the study of social order.
Such interpretive transpositions gadfinkel not make the ethnomethodologist a phenomenologist, or ethnomethodology a form of phenomenology. The focus of the investigation used in our example is the social order of surfing, the ethnomethodological interest is in the “how” the methods and practices of the production and maintenance of this social order.
So called phenomenological analyses of social structures that do not have prima facie reference to any garfinnkel the structures of intentional consciousness should raise questions as to the phenomenological status of such analyses. Garfinkel speaks of phenomenological texts and findings as being “appropriated” and intentionally “misread” for the purposes of exploring topics in the study of social order. Anderson The ethnomethodologists.
Wikibooks has a book on the topic of: To further muddy the waters, some phenomenological sociologists seize upon ethnomethodological findings as examples of applied phenomenology; this even when the results of these ethnomethodological investigations clearly do not make use haorld phenomenological methods, or formulate their findings in the language of phenomenology.
In essence the distinctive difference between etnometodollogia approaches and ethnomethodology is that the latter adopts a commonsense attitude towards knowledge. Ethnomethodology, Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp 15— Ethnomethodology is the study entometodologia methods people use for understanding and producing the social order in which they live. Lastly, there is no claim in any of Garfinkel’s work that ethnomethodology is a form of phenomenology, or phenomenological sociology.
Books by Harold Garfinkel (Author of Studies in Ethnomethodology)
Ethnomethodology provides methods which have been used in ethnographic studies to produce accounts of people’s methods for negotiating everyday situations. Conflict theory Structural functionalism Symbolic interactionism.
The relationship between ethnomethodology and conversation analysis has been contentious at times, given their overlapping interests, the close collaboration between their founders and the subsequent divergence of interest among many practitioners. Articles that may contain original research from June All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from April Etnometodologla articles with NDL identifiers.
These may be characterised as:. Instead, these borrowings are only fragmentary references to theoretical works from which ethnomethodology has appropriated theoretical ideas for the expressed purposes of doing ethnomethodological investigations.
As Garfinkel states in regard to the work of the phenomenologist Aron Gurwitsch, especially his “Field of Consciousness” On the other hand, where the study of conversational talk is divorced from its situated context—that is, when it takes on the character of a purely technical method and “formal analytic” enterprise in its own right—it is not a form of ethnomethodology. It is also naturally reflexive to and constitutive of that order.
Thus, there is an essential natural reflexity between the activity of making sense of a social setting and the ongoing production of that setting; the two are in effect identical. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page.
June Learn how and when to remove this template message. The term’s meaning can be broken down into its three constituent parts: Ethnomethodology is not Durkheimian, although it shares some of the interests of Durkheim; it is not phenomenology, although it borrows from Husserl and Schutz’s studies of the lifeworld Lebenswelt ; it is not a form of Gestalt theory, although it describes social orders as having Gestalt-like properties; and, it is not Wittgensteinian, although it makes use of Wittgenstein’s understanding of rule-use, etc.
This interest developed out of Garfinkel’s critique of Talcott Parsons ‘ attempt to derive a general theory of society. Furthermore, these practices or methods are witnessably enacted, making them available for study. This page was last edited on 30 Octoberat